Performance Comparison of IDE and SCSI Disks
نویسندگان
چکیده
It is widely believed that the IDE disks found in PCs are inexpensive but slow, whereas the SCSI disks used in servers and workstations are faster, more reliable, and more manageable. The belief that current IDE disks have performance and reliability disadvantages has been called into question by several recent reports. Thus we consider the possibility of achieving tremendous cost advantages by using IDE disks as the foundation of a storage system. In this paper, we give an extensive performance comparison of IDE and SCSI disks. We measure their performance on a variety of micro benchmarks and macro benchmarks, and we explain these results with the help of kernel instrumentation and device activity traces collected by a SCSI analyzer. We consider the impact of several factors, including sequential vs. random workloads, file system enhancements such as journaling and Soft Updates, I/O scheduling in the kernel vs. in the disk drive (as enabled by tagged queuing), and the use of RAID technology to obtain I/O parallelism. In our testbed we find that the IDE disk is faster than the SCSI disk for sequential I/O, but the SCSI disk is faster for random I/O. We also observe that the random I/O performance deficit of the IDE disk is partly overcome by kernel I/O scheduling, and is further mitigated by scheduling in the drive (as enabled by tagged queuing), and by the use of journaling and Soft Updates. Taken as a whole, our results lead us to conclude that RAID systems based on IDE drives can be both faster and significantly less expensive than SCSI RAID systems.
منابع مشابه
Microbenchmark-based Extraction of Local and Global Disk Characteristics
Obtaining timely and accurate information about the low-level characteristics of disk drives presents a problem for system design and implementation alike. This paper presents a collection of three disk microbenchmarks which combine to empirically extract a relevant subset of disk geometry and performance parameters in an efficient and accurate manner, without requiring a priori information of ...
متن کاملA Study of Disk Performance Optimization
A STUDY OF DISK PERFORMANCE OPTIMIZATION by Richard S. Gray Response time is one of the most important performance measures associated with a typical multi-user system. Response time, in turn, is bounded by the performance of the input/output (I/O) subsystem. Other than the end user and some external peripherals, the slowest component of the I/O subsystem is the disk drive. One standard strateg...
متن کاملPROUHD : RAID for the end-user
RAID has still not been adopted by most end-users despite its inherent quality such as performance and reliability. Reasons such as complexity of RAID technology (levels, hard/soft), set-up, or support may be given. We believe the main reason is that most end-users own a vast amount of heterogeneous storage devices (USB stick, IDE/SATA/SCSI internal/external hard drives, SD/XD Card, SSD, . . .)...
متن کاملWorking with Arrays of Inexpensive EIDE Disk Drives
In today’s marketplace, the cost per Terabyte of disks with EIDE interfaces is about a third that of disks with SCSI. Hence, three times as many particle physics events could be put online with EIDE. The modern EIDE interface includes many of the performance features that appeared earlier in SCSI. EIDE bus speeds approach 33 Megabytes/s and need only be shared between two disks rather than seve...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2001